Statistical Methods in Medical Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bohning, D.
Right arrow Articles by Holling, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bohning, D.
Right arrow Articles by Holling, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
First published on March 28, 2008
Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2008, doi:10.1177/0962280207081867


Article

Revisiting youden`s index as a useful measure of the misclassification error in meta-analysisof diagnostic studies

Dankmar Bohning1*, Walailuck Bohning2, and Heinz Holling2

1 Applied Statistics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK and
2 Statistics and Methods, Institute for Psychology IV, University of Münster, Münster, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

The paper considers meta-analysis of diagnostic studies that use a continuous score for classification of study participants into healthy or diseased groups. Classification is often done on the basis of a threshold or cut-off value, which might vary between studies.Consequently, conventional meta-analysis methodology focusing solely on separate analysis of sensitivity and specificity might be confounded by a potentially unknown variation of the cut-off value. To cope with this phenomena it is suggested to use, instead, an overall estimate of the misclassification error previously suggested and used as Youden's index and; furthermore, it is argued that this index is less prone to between-study variation of cut-off values. A simple Mantel-Haenszel estimator as a summary measure of the overall misclassification error is suggested, which adjusts for a potential study effect. Themeasure of the misclassification error based on Youden's index is advantageous in that it easily allows an extension to a likelihood approach, which is then ableto cope with unobserved heterogeneity via a nonparametric mixture model. Allmethods are illustrated at hand of an example on a diagnostic meta-analysis onduplex doppler ultrasound, with angiography as the standard for stroke prevention.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?